Visualize weekly strength-training workload across movement categories, exercises and training days instead of relying on a single total-set number.
Enter working sets for each movement category on each day. A zero means no meaningful set exposure in that cell.
Two strength programs can contain the same number of weekly sets and still create very different schedules. One may spread work evenly across four days while another concentrates most of the work into one session. Looking at the distribution reveals that structure.
The matrix lets you enter movement-category sets for each day. It then totals the week by pattern and by day, making it easy to spot concentration, underrepresented categories and days that carry an unusual share of the workload.
This tool deliberately uses movement categories rather than individual muscles. Categories such as push, pull and hinge are broad planning labels. Use them to understand structure, then use your exercise or muscle-group tools for more granular analysis.
A large percentage for one pattern is not automatically a problem. It may be exactly what a specialized program intends. The useful question is whether the concentration matches the program's priorities and whether the same days also contain other demanding exposures.
For the most useful picture, enter working sets rather than planned-but-missed sets. Keep your category rules consistent from week to week so the visual change actually means something.
No. It visualizes set distribution only.
Yes. Enter sets on the three active days and leave the others at zero.
Absolutely. The tool highlights concentration; it does not label concentration as good or bad by itself.
The intended input is meaningful working sets.
This page analyzes one entered week. Use the block comparison tool for two broader training blocks.
Patterns make it easier to see repeated mechanical demands across exercises without relying on a single muscle-group taxonomy.